Wednesday, February 19, 2020

The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention - Essay Example Trade among countries plays a fundamental role in building their economical power. With mutual collaboration in terms of trade, different nations satisfy one another’s needs. In fact, many nations depend upon trade and will suffer from severe economic decline if the trade ended. Once this happens, economic decline will soon be followed by cultural and social decline, and such a nation may collapse as a whole. Role of trade in maintaining the solidarity and integrity of a nation can not be denied. Yet, Friedman’s assertion that trade partners can never fight with each other seems quite exaggerated and abstract, and history provides evidence for this. Although Friedman has referred to the case of India and Pakistan, and China and Taiwan in an attempt to support his argument with facts from the history, yet a careful analysis of the very cases suggests that there were several other reasons that kept India and Pakistan from fighting with each other that were much more stron ger than the maintenance of trade. India and Pakistan did not fight with each other in the start of 21st century because India had realized that Pakistan is also accoutered with nuclear power. Had she started the war, Pakistan would have paid her in the same coin, and the consequences would have been as unfavorable for India herself, as for Pakistan. To say that India did not start a war with Pakistan at that time because she feared she would loose her trade partners is indeed, incomplete truth. Similar reasons can be sorted out for the case of China and Taiwan. Corporate bodies have opened their franchises almost all over the world. Same holds true for embassies. All countries have conventionally maintained their embassies in conflicting countries. The safety of embassies has never been on stake despite that fact that a lot of countries have indulged in war with one another in the past. On the other hand, William Duiker is skeptical about the unity among individual nations on the

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Business Law - land law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Business Law - land law - Case Study Example By its very nature, a claim of adverse possession is hostile to the claims of other persons. It cannot be hidden but must be open and notorious in order to put other persons on notice as to one's claim for possession of the real estate. A claim to title by adverse possession often must be made under color of title. Color of title means a claim to title by way of a fact which, although on its face appears to support a person's claim to title, is in some way defective and falls short of actually establishing title to the real estate. An example of a claim made under color of title would be a deed whose execution was defective or is in question. Another example is a claim arising from another person's Last Will and Testament. Yet another common example is where two or more persons have received separate deeds to the same parcel of real estate." Black's Law (2006). "Unknown to the owner, a third person - a "squatter" - may be in illegal and unauthorized occupation of a far corner of the land parcel. If nothing is done to remove him, after a certain period of time the squatter may eventually acquire legal rights over the land parcel, or part of it. Further, questions may arise as to the relationship between the formal owner of the land parcel, often a male, and other family members. What interests, if any, do women and other members of the owner's family hold in the land" Hodgson (2004). Second, does he have a reason to believe that he has a right to be there and keep the land Hill Bob may have been given a portion of the land through title in a last will and testament. Third, how many years has he actually lived on the land Hill Bob would be able to claim adverse possession of a portion of the land if it were obvious that he could support that claim. In Colorado, the duration of such possession is seven (7) years if the claimant claims under color of title. If the claimant does not make his/her claim under color of title, the duration of possession is eighteen (18) years. Colorado Code 38-41-101, 108, 109. Fourth, has he ever been told by a previous owner that in exchange for work completed to the land, a portion of the land belonged to him in exchange For example in a different state, the person claiming must past three tests. "Under the Limitations Act in Ontario, an owner's title to land can be extinguished by the adverse possession of another person for a period of 10 years. In order for an adverse possession claim to succeed, the person claiming the disputed land must meet three tests. Throughout the entire 10-year period, he or she must have:had actual exclusive, open, and visible possession,had the intention to exclude the true owner from possession, and effectively excluded the true owner from possession." Aaron (2002) In summary, if Tim sued Hill Bill and Hill Bill has been in possession of the